Published on 11/26/2025 Staff Pick

Solved: Facebook Ads Showing to the Wrong Audience?

Inside this article, you'll discover:

Am running facebook ads and there showing to peeple that are not in the target audience, like am targeting peeple 18-25 but is showing to peeple up to 60!??! Is there anything i can do about this?? Can you maybe help and tell me if this has to do with advantage+ audience? cause i dont know what to do here

Mentioned On*

Bloomberg MarketWatch Reuters BUSINESS INSIDER National Post

Hi there,

Thanks for reaching out!

Happy to give you some initial thoughts on your Facebook ads situation. It's a really common thing to see and it causes a lot of confusion, but the answer probably isn't what you're expecting. You've hit on one of the biggest shifts in how Meta ads work these days, and it forces us to think less about who is clicking, and a lot more about who is actually buying.

Let's get straight into it.

TLDR;

  • Yes, it's almost certainly the 'Advantage+ Audience' feature showing your ads to people outside your 18-25 age target. This is intentional behaviour by Meta.
  • This isn't necessarily a bad thing. In fact, if your campaign is set up correctly, it could be a very good thing. The algorithm is finding you customers you didn't know you had.
  • The most important piece of advice is to stop focusing on the demographics of who is clicking your ads and start focusing obsessively on the Cost Per Result of who is converting. A click from a 60-year-old that leads to a sale is infinitely more valuable than a click from a 20-year-old that doesn't.
  • Your campaign objective (e.g., Traffic vs. Conversions) is the single most important setting that dictates who sees your ads. Get this wrong, and you're just paying Facebook to find non-customers.
  • This letter includes a detailed breakdown of why this happens, a flowchart visualising campaign objectives, and an interactive calculator to help you understand your real acquisition costs.

We'll need to look at why Facebook is ignoring your targeting...

So, your suspicion is spot on. The reason you're seeing clicks from people outside your specified 18-25 age range is because of a feature called Advantage+ Audience. This used to be a little tick-box called 'Detailed Targeting Expansion', but Meta has made it more central to how ad sets work now, and in some cases, it's on by default and you can't even turn it off.

Here’s the simple version of what it does: You give Facebook a set of instructions, your 'ideal' audience—in your case, people aged 18-25. Facebook looks at that and says, "Right, got it. That's a good starting point." Then, its algorithm immediately starts looking for people outside that group who share similar characteristics and behaviours to the people inside your group who are actually converting.

Think of it like this: you send a personal shopper out to buy you a specific brand of trainers in a size 9. But you tell them, "Look, if you find a different brand that's a better fit, higher quality, and on sale, just buy those instead. My ultimate goal is to get a great pair of trainers, not specifically that one brand."

That's what you're doing with Advantage+ Audience. You're telling Meta, "My goal is to get [conversions/sales/leads]. Here's who I think my customer is (18-25 year olds), but if you can find me cheaper or more frequent conversions from 60-year-olds, go for it. I trust you."

The old way of running ads was to build these tiny, perfectly curated audiences and force the ads onto them. The new way—the way that actually works at scale—is to give the algorithm a clear goal (your conversion event) and a broad starting point, and then let its machine learning do the heavy lifting. Trying to micromanage every demographic is an outdated strategy that often leads to higher costs and limits the platform's ability to find you customers. The machine is smarter than us at finding patterns in user data, so our job has shifted from being a targeting perfectionist to being a brilliant strategist who gives the machine the right goals and the right creative.

I'd say you are focusing on the wrong metric...

This brings me to the most important point, and it's a bit of a contrarian view. The fact that a 60-year-old is clicking your ad is, in itself, completely and utterly irrelevant. It's a vanity metric. It tells you nothing about the health of your business or the success of your campaign.

The only question you should be asking is: Are these people converting?

Let's imagine you sell graphic t-shirts aimed at students. You set your targeting to 18-25. The algorithm starts showing ads and finds that, for some reason, a small cluster of people aged 55-65 are not only clicking, but they're buying. Why? Who knows. Maybe they're buying gifts for their grandkids. Maybe they just have surprisingly youthful taste. Does the 'why' really matter if they're giving you money at a profitable cost per sale?

If you force Facebook to *only* show ads to 18-25 year olds, you might miss out on that profitable pocket of customers. Your overall cost per sale might go up because you've artificially restricted the algorithm from finding the cheapest conversions available on the platform.

This is why your campaign objective is so critical. There's a fundamental misunderstanding I see all the time. People think they are paying for their ad to be shown to their target audience. That's not true. You are paying Facebook to achieve an objective, and it will show your ad to the people within your audience most likely to help you achieve it cheaply.

If your objective is 'Traffic' or 'Reach', you are literally telling Facebook: "Please find me the people inside (and outside) my target audience who are most likely to click on things or see things, for the lowest possible price." The algorithm, being very good at its job, goes out and finds people who are known to click on lots of ads but rarely buy anything. Their attention is cheap. You are actively paying the world's most powerful advertising machine to find you the worst possible audience for your product. You're optimising for worthless actions.

If your objective is 'Conversions' (or 'Sales'), you are telling Facebook: "I don't really care who sees it. Just go and find me people who will perform this specific action (e.g., purchase, fill out a lead form) at the lowest possible cost." Now, the algorithm's entire focus shifts. It ignores the cheap clickers and starts hunting for buyers, wherever they may be.

This is the fundamental choice every advertiser makes, whether they realise it or not.

Objective: Traffic/Reach
You told Meta: "Find me the most eyeballs or clicks for the lowest price."
The Algorithm's Action
It finds users who click on everything but buy nothing. Their attention is cheap. This includes people outside your target demographic.
Your Result: Non-Customers
High click volume, low CPC, lots of irrelevant traffic, and crucially, no sales. You've paid to attract the wrong people.
Objective: Conversions/Sales
You told Meta: "Find me people who will actually buy my product, regardless of cost-per-click."
The Algorithm's Action
It ignores the cheap clickers and hunts for users with a history of purchasing. It will expand beyond your initial targeting if it finds buyers there.
Your Result: Customers
Lower click volume, higher CPC, but the traffic is highly qualified and leads to actual sales and a positive ROAS.

This flowchart illustrates the critical difference between campaign objectives. The path you choose determines whether you pay Facebook to find you non-customers or actual customers.

You probably should be asking 'What is my campaign optimising for?'...

So, the first thing you need to do is go into your Ads Manager and check what campaign objective you've selected. If it's anything other than 'Sales' or 'Leads' (depending on your goal), then that's your problem right there. You've given the machine the wrong instructions.

If you are running a 'Sales' campaign and have your pixel set up correctly to track purchases, and you're still seeing clicks from 60-year-olds, then you should check your reports to see if they are actually buying. In your Ads Manager, you can use the 'Breakdown' feature by age. If you see that the 55-65 age bracket has a profitable Cost Per Purchase, then you should celebrate! The algorithm is working its magic and has found a new, unexpected customer segment for your business. This is a win, not a problem.

If they are clicking but not buying at all, and your campaign has been running for a while with a decent budget, then it might be a sign that the algorithm is struggling to find conversions and is just defaulting to cheaper traffic. This can happen if your creative isn't resonating, your offer isn't compelling, or your budget is too low for it to exit the 'learning phase'. But the solution isn't to restrict the age range; it's to fix the underlying problem with the creative, the offer or the landing page.

The core relationship to understand is between the cost of your traffic (CPC) and how well that traffic converts on your website (Conversion Rate). Together, they determine your actual Cost Per Acquisition (CPA). A cheap click that never converts is infinitely expensive. A more expensive click that reliably converts can be incredibly profitable. You need to get comfortable with higher CPCs if they lead to lower CPAs. The maths has to work out.

To help you get a feel for this, I've put together a simple calculator. Play around with the sliders to see how a small change in conversion rate can have a massive impact on your final cost to acquire a customer, even if the cost per click goes up.

Cost Per Click (CPC) £1.25
Cost Per Acquisition (CPA) £50.00

Use this interactive calculator to see the relationship between ad spend, clicks, and conversion rate. Notice how a higher conversion rate can drastically lower your Cost Per Acquisition, making higher Cost Per Click traffic profitable. Results are for illustrative purposes only. For a tailored analysis, please consider scheduling a free consultation.

You'll need a better way to structure your audiences...

Okay, so let's assume you've fixed your campaign objective to 'Sales' or 'Leads'. You're ready to trust the algorithm a bit more. Does that mean targeting doesn't matter at all? No, not at all. Structure is still hugely important for control, budgeting, and understanding what's working.

Instead of thinking about one single audience, I'd encourage you to think in terms of a funnel: Top of Funnel (ToFu), Middle of Funnel (MoFu), and Bottom of Funnel (BoFu).

  • ToFu (Top of Funnel): This is your prospecting campaign. Its job is to find new people who have never heard of you. This is where you'd use your 18-25 age targeting, combined with relevant interests. And yes, you would leave Advantage+ Audience turned on here to let Meta prospect for you.
  • MoFu (Middle of Funnel): These are people who have shown some interest but haven't taken a key action yet. This is a retargeting audience. You could target people who have watched 50% of your video ads, or people who have visited your website but didn't add anything to their cart. The messaging here would be different, maybe showing them customer testimonials or a different angle of your product.
  • BoFu (Bottom of Funnel): This is your hottest audience. These are people who have shown strong buying signals—they've added a product to the cart, or initiated checkout, but didn't complete the purchase. You retarget them with an ad that gives them a little nudge, maybe reminding them of the product or offering free shipping. This is where your best return on ad spend usually comes from.

By splitting your campaigns this way, you get the best of both worlds. You let the algorithm run wild at the ToFu stage to find new customers efficiently, but you maintain tight control over your MoFu and BoFu audiences to nurture and convert the people who are already in your ecosystem. This kind of structured approach is what separates amateur advertisers from professionals. It ensures you're not just throwing spaghetti at the wall but building a repeatable system for customer acquisition.

The cost to acquire a customer (CPA) will naturally be different at each stage of this funnel. It's most expensive to acquire a brand new customer at the top, and cheapest to convert someone who has already added an item to their cart at the bottom. Understanding this performance difference is key to managing your budget effectively.

£25
ToFu
(Prospecting)
£15
MoFu
(Website Visitors)
£8
BoFu
(Cart Abandoners)

Illustrative example of typical Cost Per Acquisition (CPA) by funnel stage. It's most expensive to acquire a new customer (ToFu) and cheapest to convert a hot lead (BoFu). Your strategy should account for this.

This is the main advice I have for you:

To wrap this all up, a lot of modern paid advertising, especially on platforms like Meta, is about un-learning old habits. We have to move from being micromanagers to being smart strategists who leverage the power of the platform's algorithm. It can be a scary transition, but it's the only way to get sustainable results. I've detailed my main recommendations for you below:


The Problem You're Seeing My Recommendation Why This Is The Right Approach
Clicks from outside target age: You've set your ads to 18-25 but people up to 60 are clicking. Go to your campaign settings and confirm your objective is set to 'Sales' or 'Leads', not 'Traffic' or 'Reach'. This is non-negotiable. This changes the algorithm's goal from finding cheap clicks (who can be anyone) to finding actual buyers (who might be outside your initial guess). You're optimising for money, not for clicks.
Worry about Advantage+ Audience: You think the feature is breaking your targeting and want to disable it. Keep it enabled, especially in prospecting (ToFu) campaigns. Instead, ensure your conversion tracking (Meta Pixel) is perfectly accurate. You are leveraging Meta's machine learning to find pockets of profitable customers you would have never found yourself. A correct pixel setup is your 'leash' on the algorithm.
Focus on click demographics: Your main concern is the age of the people clicking your ads. Shift your analysis entirely. Ignore click demographics and focus on Cost Per Acquisition (CPA) and Return On Ad Spend (ROAS), broken down by age. Business success is measured in profit, not in who clicks an ad. If a demographic is profitable, you scale it. If it's not, you analyse why, but you don't exclude it based on a whim.
Simple campaign structure: You are likely running one ad set targeting one general audience. Implement a ToFu/MoFu/BoFu funnel structure with separate campaigns for prospecting (finding new people) and retargeting (nurturing warm leads). This gives you a systematic way to move customers from awareness to purchase. It allows for tailored messaging at each stage and provides clarity on where your budget is performing best.

Putting a strategy like this into place can feel like a lot of work, especially when you're used to doing things a certain way. It requires a solid technical setup with your pixel, a thoughtful campaign structure, and creative that is built to convert, not just to be seen. It definitely takes expertise to get right.

This is where working with a specialist can make all the difference. We do this day-in, day-out, and can help you bypass the expensive trial-and-error phase by implementing a professional, data-driven advertising system from the start.

If you'd like to go through your ad account together on a call, I'd be happy to offer a free, no-obligation strategy session. We can look at your current setup, diagnose the core issues, and outline a clear plan to get you focused on the metrics that actually grow your business.

Regards,

Team @ Lukas Holschuh

Real Results

See how we've turned 5-figure ad spends
into 6-figure revenue streams.

View All Case Studies
$ Software / Google Ads

3,543 users at £0.96 each

A detailed walkthrough on how we achieved 3,543 users at just £0.96 each using Google Ads. We used a variety of campaigns, including Search, PMax, Discovery, and app install campaigns. Discover our strategy, campaign setup, and results.

Implement This For Me
$ Software / Meta Ads

5082 Software Trials at $7 per trial

We reveal the exact strategy we've used to drive 5,082 trials at just $7 per trial for a B2B software product. See the strategy, designs, campaign setup, and optimization techniques.

Implement This For Me
👥 eLearning / Meta Ads

$115k Revenue in 1.5 Months

Walk through the strategy we've used to scale an eLearning course from launch to $115k in sales. We delve into the campaign's ad designs, split testing, and audience targeting that propelled this success.

Implement This For Me
📱 App Growth / Multiple

45k+ signups at under £2 each

Learn how we achieved app installs for under £1 and leads for under £2 for a software and sports events client. We used a multi-channel strategy, including a chatbot to automatically qualify leads, custom-made landing pages, and campaigns on multiple ad platforms.

Implement This For Me
🏆 Luxury / Meta Ads

£107k Revenue at 618% ROAS

Learn the winning strategy that turned £17k in ad spend into a £107k jackpot. We'll reveal the exact strategies and optimizations that led to these outstanding numbers and how you can apply them to your own business.

Implement This For Me
💼 B2B / LinkedIn Ads

B2B decision makers: $22 CPL

Watch this if you're struggling with B2B lead generation or want to increase leads for your sales team. We'll show you the power of conversion-focused ad copy, effective ad designs, and the use of LinkedIn native lead form ads that we've used to get B2B leads at $22 per lead.

Implement This For Me
👥 eLearning / Meta Ads

7,400 leads - eLearning

Unlock proven eLearning lead generation strategies with campaign planning, ad creative, and targeting tips. Learn how to boost your course enrollments effectively.

Implement This For Me
🏕 Outdoor / Meta Ads

Campaign structure to drive 18k website visitors

We dive into the impressive campaign structure that has driven a whopping 18,000 website visitors for ARB in the outdoor equipment niche. See the strategy behind this successful campaign, including split testing, targeting options, and the power of continuous optimisation.

Implement This For Me
🛒 eCommerce / Meta Ads

633% return, 190 % increase in revenue

We show you how we used catalogue ads and product showcases to drive these impressive results for an e-commerce store specialising in cleaning products.

Implement This For Me
🌍 Environmental / LinkedIn & Meta

How to reduce your cost per lead by 84%

We share some amazing insights and strategies that led to an 84% decrease in cost per lead for Stiebel Eltron's water heater and heat pump campaigns.

Implement This For Me
🛒 eCommerce / Meta Ads

8x Return, $71k Revenue - Maps & Navigation

Learn how we tackled challenges for an Australian outdoor store to significantly boost purchase volumes and maintain a strong return on ad spend through effective ad campaigns and strategic performance optimisation.

Implement This For Me
$ Software / Meta Ads

4,622 Registrations at $2.38

See how we got 4,622 B2B software registrations at just $2.38 each! We’ll cover our ad strategies, campaign setups, and optimisation tips.

Implement This For Me
📱 Software / Meta & Google

App & Marketplace Growth: 5700 Signups

Get the insight scoop of this campaign we ran for a childcare services marketplace and app. With 5700 signups across two ad platforms and multiple campaign types.

Implement This For Me
🎓 Student Recruitment / Meta Ads

How to reduce your cost per booking by 80%

We discuss how to reduce your cost per booking by 80% in student recruitment. We explore a case study where a primary school in Melbourne, Australia implemented a simple optimisation.

Implement This For Me
🛒 eCommerce / Meta Ads

Store launch - 1500 leads at $0.29/leads

Learn how we built awareness for this store's launch while targeting a niche audience and navigating ad policies.

Implement This For Me

Unlock The Ad Expertise You're Missing.

Free Consultation & Audit