TLDR;
- The advice from the "Meta Pro" to spend a minimum of $45/day isn't just a sales tactic; it's based on the algorithm needing about 50 conversions per week to learn properly. However, it's not the whole story.
- Switching to "awareness campaigns" on a small budget is terrible advice. You'd be paying Meta to find people who are guaranteed not to buy from you. Always optimise for conversions, regardless of budget.
- Your real problem isn't the small budget. It's the underlying maths of your business—your offer, your conversion rate, and your customer lifetime value (LTV). A strong offer can be profitable even on $10/day.
- The most important thing you can do is calculate your LTV to understand how much you can truly afford to spend to acquire a customer. Stop focusing on the daily ad spend and start focusing on profitability.
- This letter includes an interactive calculator to help you figure out your Customer Lifetime Value (LTV), which is the single most important number for making your ads profitable.
Hi there,
Thanks for reaching out!
The situation you described is something we hear about all the time. You get on a call with a "Meta Pro" and they give you some generic, one-size-fits-all advice that leaves you more confused than when you started. That line about needing a "$45/day minimum" or else you should just run awareness campaigns is a classic. They couldn't explain it because, frankly, it's lazy advice that misses the entire point.
So, were they just trying to get you to spend more? Yes and no. There's a small grain of technical truth in what they said, but their conclusion to just run awareness campaigns instead is genuinely terrible advice for a small business like yours. It'll just burn your cash faster.
The real issue here isn't your daily budget. It's about making the maths of your advertising work for you, even at a small scale. Let's break down what's actually going on and how you can make that $10 a day work a lot harder.
Why "Brand Awareness" Campaigns are a Trap for Small Businesses...
First, let's get this out of the way. The suggestion to switch to awareness campaigns is probably the worst piece of advice you could get. It's critical to understand that when you select a campaign objective in Meta, you are giving a very specific command to an incredibly powerful algorithm.
- When you choose "Conversions", you're telling Meta: "Go through the billions of people on your platform, analyse all the data you have, and find me the specific individuals who are most likely to actually buy my product. I'm willing to pay more to reach these valuable people."
- When you choose "Brand Awareness" or "Reach", you're telling Meta: "Find me the largest number of eyeballs for the cheapest possible price. I don't care who they are, I just want my ad seen."
The algorithm, being very good at its job, does exactly what you ask. For an awareness campaign, it seeks out users whose attention is cheap. And why is their attention cheap? Because they're not in demand. They're the people who scroll endlessly but never click, never engage, and certainly never pull out a credit card. You are literally paying Facebook to find you the worst possible audience for your product. For a massive company like Coca-Cola, that's fine. They just want to stay top-of-mind. For a small business where every dollar counts, it's a complete waste of money.
So, you're absolutely right to be running conversion campaigns. Even with a small budget, you are giving the algorithm the correct instructions. The problem isn't the instruction; it's about giving the algorithm enough data and having strong enough business economics to make it work.
The grain of truth in Meta's advice (and why it's usually misinterpreted)...
So why did the Meta rep mention the $45/day figure? This comes down to something called the "learning phase".
When you launch a new ad set, the algorithm needs to figure out who your ideal customer is. It does this by showing your ad to different types of people and seeing who converts. To do this effectively and exit the learning phase, Meta's systems generally need about 50 conversions per ad set within a 7-day period.
If an ad set doesn't get enough conversions, it gets stuck in "Learning Limited" mode. This doesn't mean it stops running, but it does mean the performance will be less stable, your costs can fluctuate wildly, and the algorithm never truly gets enough data to properly optimise. It's essentially guessing more than it's learning.
Now let's do the maths. Let's say a realistic Cost Per Acquisition (CPA) for your business is $20.
50 conversions * $20/conversion = $1000 needed per week.
$1000 / 7 days = ~$142 per day.
As you can see, the $45/day figure the rep gave you is actually on the low side if your CPA is high. They likely plucked that number out of the air based on an assumed CPA of around $6-$7. The point is, their recommendation is based on this mechanical need for data. With a $10/day budget, unless your CPA is less than $1.40 (which is highly unlikely), you're not going to hit that 50-conversion threshold. Your campaigns will permanently be in "Learning Limited".
But here's the bit they miss: that's okay. For a small business, being in "Learning Limited" isn't a death sentence. It just means you have to be smarter about everything else. You can't rely on the algorithm to do all the heavy lifting for you. You have to compensate for the lack of data with a brilliant offer, killer creative, and hyper-specific targeting.
Low Budget Path
$10/day Budget
Weekly Conversions
~3-5 (at $15-$20 CPA)
Algorithm Status
Learning Limited
Outcome
Unstable performance, unpredictable CPA, hard to scale. Requires very strong offer & creative to be profitable.
Optimal Budget Path
$100+/day Budget
Weekly Conversions
50+
Algorithm Status
Active (Learning Complete)
Outcome
Stable performance, predictable delivery, ready to scale. The algorithm does the heavy lifting.
I'd say your problem isn't the budget, it's the underlying maths...
You mentioned that your ads "pay for themselves" but aren't "super profitable". This is a very telling detail. It tells me that you're close, but the economics are just slightly off. Paid advertising is an amplifier. It takes what you already have and shows it to more people.
- If you have a highly profitable offer, ads will make you a lot more profit.
- If you have a break-even offer, ads will get you a lot more break-even customers.
- If you have an unprofitable offer, ads will lose you money, just much faster.
Spending more money won't fix a "break-even" problem. It will just scale it. The real solution lies in fixing the core components of your campaign: your offer and your conversion rate. An offer isn't just a discount. A great offer solves a painful, urgent problem for a specific group of people so effectively that the price feels like a bargain.
Think about it this way. Which is more powerful?
Offer A: "Small Business Accounting Services. 10% Off Your First Month."
This is generic. It speaks to no one in particular and relies on a weak discount.
Offer B: "For UK-based eCommerce store owners: We'll sort out your VAT and bookkeeping in 5 days so you never have to dread a HMRC letter again. Fixed monthly price, no surprise bills."
This is specific. It identifies the customer (eCommerce owners), names their fear (HMRC), provides a clear solution and timeline (VAT & bookkeeping in 5 days), and removes a common friction point (surprise bills).
Offer B will convert at a much higher rate than Offer A. A higher conversion rate means a lower Cost Per Acquisition (CPA). And if your CPA is low enough, suddenly your $10/day budget starts to look a lot more effective. If you can get your CPA down to, say, $5, you could potentially get 2 conversions a day, or 14 a week. That's still not 50, but it's a lot more data for the algorithm and you're actually profitable. The focus should be on improving the offer, not just increasing the spend.
You'll need to know your numbers: Calculating Customer Lifetime Value (LTV)...
This brings us to the most important number that most small business owners ignore: Customer Lifetime Value (LTV). You can't know if your ads are truly profitable if you don't know what a customer is actually worth to you over the long term.
The real question isn't "How low can my CPA go?" but "How high a CPA can I afford to acquire a great customer and still be very profitable?" The answer is in your LTV. Let's break down the calculation.
- Average Revenue Per Account (ARPA): What do you make from an average customer each month?
- Gross Margin %: What's your profit margin on that revenue after accounting for costs of goods sold? For a service business, this is often very high.
- Monthly Churn Rate %: What percentage of your customers do you lose each month, on average? (If you have one-off sales, you can estimate how many purchases a customer makes per year to figure this out).
The formula is: LTV = (ARPA * Gross Margin %) / Monthly Churn Rate
Let's run a quick example. Say you run a subscription box service.
- ARPA = £30/month
- Gross Margin = 60% (0.60)
- Monthly Churn = 10% (0.10) of customers cancel each month
LTV = (£30 * 0.60) / 0.10 = £18 / 0.10 = £180.
In this case, each customer you acquire is worth £180 in gross profit to your business. A healthy business model often aims for a 3:1 LTV to Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) ratio. This means you could afford to spend up to £60 to acquire that customer and still have a very healthy, profitable business. Suddenly, a $20 CPA on Facebook doesn't look like "break-even," it looks like an absolute bargain. You spend £20 to make £180.
This is the maths that unlocks growth. It frees you from the tyranny of worrying about a $10/day budget and allows you to think about strategic investment. Use the calculator below to get a feel for your own numbers.
Recommended Max Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) for 3:1 Ratio:
£467You probably should focus on a "Tighter Funnel" approach...
Okay, so how do you put this into practice on a small budget? You have to be ruthlessly efficient. You can't afford a complex, multi-stage funnel where you nurture leads for months. You need to focus all your energy on the people most likely to buy right now.
1. Hyper-Specific Targeting (BoFu & MoFu First)
With a low budget, you should spend most of it on retargeting. These are people who have already shown interest in your business. Even if your website traffic is low, you can create a powerful audience by combining sources. I'd recomend creating a single "Warm Audience" ad set that includes:
- All Website Visitors (last 180 days)
- Facebook Page Engagers (last 365 days)
- Instagram Profile Engagers (last 365 days)
- People who watched 50% of any of your videos (last 365 days)
This group is your gold dust. They already know who you are. Your ad's job is simply to give them a compelling reason to come back and buy. For your prospecting (cold audience) campaigns, you have to be just as specific. Forget broad interests like "shopping" or "business". You need to find interests that your ideal customer has, but the general public does not. Think about:
- What software do they use (e.g., Shopify, Xero)?
- What industry magazines do they read?
- What influencers or experts do they follow?
- What specific competitor pages do they like?
Your Ideal Customer Profile isn't a demographic; it's a pain point. Find the people with that pain.
2. An Irresistible, Low-Friction Offer
You need an offer that converts. On a small budget, you need something that makes people act now. This is often a "tripwire" offer—a small, low-cost, high-value product or service designed to turn a prospect into a customer. The goal isn't to make a massive profit on this first sale, but to acquire a customer that you can then sell your main products to later. The initial sale just needs to cover your ad spend.
3. Creative That Does the Heavy Lifting
Your ad has about 2 seconds to grab someone's attention. You can't afford vague branding. Use the Problem-Agitate-Solve formula.
- Problem: Call out their pain point directly in the first line. "Tired of your handmade products getting lost on Etsy?"
- Agitate: Twist the knife. Remind them why it's so frustrating. "You pour your heart into your craft, only to see your sales flatline while generic sellers get all the attention."
- Solve: Introduce your product as the clear, simple solution. "Our 5-day 'Etsy Boost' program gets your products seen by buyers who are actually looking for quality crafts."
This kind of direct, benefit-driven copy works far better than generic ads when you have limited chances to make an impression.
I've detailed my main recommendations for you below:
This is the main advice I have for you, all summarised. It's a shift in thinking from "how can I spend my budget?" to "how can I build a profitable advertising system?"
| Area of Focus | Current Approach (Potential Issue) | Recommended Approach | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Campaign Objective | Conversion campaigns (correct), but worried it's wrong due to Meta's advice. | Stick with Conversion Campaigns. Never use Awareness/Reach. | You must always instruct the algorithm to find buyers, not just viewers. This is the most efficient use of your budget, no matter the size. |
| Budget & Mindset | Focusing on the low daily spend ($5-10) and whether it's "enough". | Focus on Profitability. Use LTV to determine your maximum affordable CPA. | A profitable campaign can run forever. The daily budget is irrelevant if the unit economics are sound. Shift from a cost mindset to an investment mindset. |
| Performance Goal | Aiming for "break-even". | Aim for a 3:1 LTV:CAC Ratio. Know exactly how much you need to make from each customer to be truly profitable. | Break-even isn't a sustainable growth strategy. You need a healthy margin to reinvest and grow the business. |
| Targeting | Likely using broader audiences to get enough volume. | Prioritise Retargeting. Consolidate all warm audiences into one ad set. Use hyper-specific, niche interests for cold prospecting. | On a small budget, you must be ruthlessly efficient. Talk to the people who are already warm first, then find new customers who look exactly like your best ones. |
| The Offer | Potentially a generic offer or standard product pricing. | Develop a high-value, low-friction offer. This could be a "tripwire" product or a highly valuable lead magnet. | A stronger offer increases your conversion rate, which lowers your CPA. This is the fastest way to make a small budget profitable. |
Where to go from here...
So, to answer your original question: No, it is not bad practice to run low-dollar conversion campaigns. Millions of small businesses do it successfully. It just requires a different, more strategic approach than simply throwing money at the algorithm and hoping for the best.
Stop worrying about being stuck in "Learning Limited". Instead, obsess over your offer, your landing page conversion rate, and your LTV. If you can make the maths work, you can build a profitable customer acquisition machine with the budget you have right now.
This is obviously a lot to take in, and applying these concepts to your specific business is where the real work begins. It involves a deep look at your numbers, your audience, and your market. This is exactly what we specialise in. We help businesses move from "break-even" to highly profitable by building these efficient advertising systems.
If you'd like to get a more tailored plan, we offer a free, no-obligation initial consultation. We can take a look at your current campaigns and website and give you some concrete, actionable advice on how to improve your profitability. It would be a chance for you to see how we think and for us to see if we can genuinely help.
Hope this helps clear things up!
Regards,
Team @ Lukas Holschuh