Hi there,
Thanks for reaching out!
Happy to give you some initial thoughts on your questions. It sounds like you're in the high-ticket B2B services game, which is a completly different beast to selling a £20 product online. A lot of the usual advice you see floating around just doesn't apply. You're right to think about lead costs and conversion times, but we might be looking at the problem from the wrong angle. Before we get into the weeds, let's reframe the core issue from "how much do leads cost?" to "how can I build a predictable system to attract clients who are worth £100k+?". That's the real goal here, right?
TLDR;
- Stop asking what an average lead costs. The real question is how much you can afford to pay for a great client. This is all about calculating your Customer Lifetime Value (LTV).
- Forget generic demographics. To find high-paying clients, you need to define them by their specific, expensive, career-threatening nightmares, not their company size or location.
- For high-ticket services, a detailed landing page almost always beats a simple lead form. You need to pre-qualify and build trust, even if it means a higher initial cost per lead. It's about quality, not quantity.
- Long sales cycles are normal. You absolutely must run multi-stage retargeting campaigns to stay top of mind with prospects over weeks or even months.
- This letter includes an interactive calculator to help you figure out your LTV and what you can afford to spend on ads, plus a flowchart to help you pinpoint your ideal customer's real pain points.
We'll need to look at the real question: What's a high-value client worth?
Before we even touch on what a lead costs, we need to answer a much more fundemental question: what's a client actually worth to your business over their entire relationship with you? This is the single most important number in your entire marketing operation, and almost everyone gets it wrong or just guesses.
You mentioned projects are costly and clients are worth over £100k. That's a great starting point, but that's revenue. What we really care about is profit. And we need to know how long clients tend to stick around. Without this, you're flying blind, trying to get your cost per lead (CPL) as low as possible without knowing how high you can actually afford for it to be. The goal isn't to get the cheapest leads; the goal is to profitably acquire the best clients.
This is where Lifetime Value (LTV) comes in. It tells you the total gross margin you can expect from a single customer. Once you know your LTV, you can work backwards to figure out your maximum Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC). A healthy ratio is usually around 3:1 (LTV:CAC), meaning if a customer is worth £10,000 in profit, you can comfortably spend up to £3,333 to acquire them. Suddenly, a £300 lead doesn't seem so scary, does it? It looks like a bargain, provided your sales process can convert them.
Let's break down the maths. It's simpler than it sounds:
- Average Revenue Per Account (ARPA): What's the average amount a client pays you per month or per year? If it's project-based, average out the total value of your projects and divide by the typical engagement length in months.
- Gross Margin %: What's your profit margin on that revenue? Be honest here. After all your costs of servicing that client (staff time, software, materials, etc.), what percentage is left?
- Monthly Churn Rate %: What percentage of your clients do you lose each month? If you work on fixed projects, you can calculate this by taking 1 and dividing it by the average number of months a client works with you. For example, if a project lasts 12 months, your monthly churn is (1/12) = 8.33%.
The formula is: LTV = (ARPA * Gross Margin %) / Monthly Churn Rate
This calculation is the bedrock of any scalable ad campaign. It frees you from the tyranny of chasing cheap, low-quality leads and allows you to confidently invest in acquiring the high-paying clients you're after. Use the calculator below to get a feel for your own numbers.
I'd say you need to define your customer by their nightmare, not their wallet...
Right, so now we know what a client is worth, how do we find these £100k+ behemoths? Your question about "high paying clients" is what everyone asks, but most people approach it backwards. They try to filter by demographics: "companies with 500+ employees", "businesses in the finance sector", "people with a 'Director' job title". This is a recipe for disaster. It's lazy, it's generic, and it leads to ads that speak to no one.
You need to stop thinking about who your customer is and start thinking about what problem they have. Your ideal customer isn't a demographic; it's a specific, urgent, and expensive pain point. It's a nightmare that keeps them awake at night. Your job isn't to find rich companies; it's to find companies with a problem so painful that spending £100k to solve it feels like a bargain.
Think about it. A Head of Operations at a manufacturing plant isn't just a job title. She's a leader terrified of a production line failure that could cost the company millions and put her job on the line. A CMO at a fast-growing tech firm isn't just looking for "marketing services". He's panicking because their lead pipeline has dried up and the board is breathing down his neck. Your service needs to be the aspirin for their specific headache.
When you define your customer this way, your targeting becomes laser-sharp. Instead of targeting "Directors," you start thinking:
- What specific software do they use every day (e.g., Salesforce, HubSpot, specific industry ERPs)? You can target users of these tools.
- What industry newsletters do they actually read (e.g., Stratechery for tech, Morning Brew for business)?
- What niche podcasts do they listen to on their commute?
- Which influencers or thought leaders do they follow on LinkedIn?
- What specific, jargon-filled keywords would they type into Google when this nightmare problem finally becomes unbearable?
This is the real work. It's not about picking states on a map; it's about building a deep, almost obsessive understanding of your ideal client's world. Once you have this, creating ads and choosing where to run them becomes ten times easier. The flowchart below can help you structure this thinking.
Step 1: The Role
Who is the person, the decision maker, you need to convince? Go beyond job title. e.g., "VP of Sales".
Step 2: The Nightmare
What is their specific, urgent, expensive problem? e.g., "The sales team is missing quota by 30% and top reps are leaving".
Step 3: The Language
How do they describe this problem to their peers? What keywords do they use? e.g., "sales pipeline velocity", "lead quality issues".
Step 4: The Watering Hole
Where do they go for solutions? Niche blogs, podcasts, LinkedIn groups, conferences? e.g., 'SaaStr' content, follow Jason Lemkin.
You probably should use landing pages, not lead forms...
This brings us to your question about lead forms versus landing pages. For low-ticket items or simple sign-ups, lead forms (like those on Facebook or LinkedIn) can be great. They're low friction, auto-fill the user's details, and can generate a high volume of leads cheaply.
But you are not selling a simple product. You're selling a high-cost, high-trust solution. The person you need to reach is busy, skeptical, and has a lot on the line. They won't make a £100k decision based on a single ad. Your goal isn't just to get their email address; it's to start a conversation, build trust, and pre-qualify them so you're not wasting your time on sales calls with tyre-kickers.
This is where a dedicated landing page is non-negotiable. A lead form is a flimsy leaflet; a landing page is your digital sales rep. It gives you the space to:
- Address the 'Nightmare': Your headline should speak directly to their pain point.
- Build Credibility: Showcase case studies, testimonials, client logos, and any awards or recognition. This directly tackles the trust issues you mentioned.
- Explain the Process: Clearly outline what it's like to work with you. Demystify your service and make it feel less risky.
- Filter and Qualify: Your form on the landing page can ask more qualifying questions than a standard lead form. This weeds out the smaller clients and ensures the leads you get are worth your time.
Yes, you will get fewer leads from a landing page than a lead form. And your initial Cost Per Lead will be higher. But the quality of those leads will be exponentially better. You're trading volume for value. For a high-ticket service, one excellent, well-qualified lead is worth a hundred low-intent, unqualified names on a spreadsheet. We've seen this time and time again. For example, we ran a LinkedIn Ads campaign for a B2B software client that achieved a $22 cost per lead, but for a high-value service like yours, the focus must shift from a low CPL to attracting the highest quality prospects, which a dedicated landing page is designed to do.
The choice is a trade-off between friction and qualification. For your kind of business, you need to lean heavily towards qualification.
Lead Forms
- ✓ Low Cost Per Lead
- ✓ High Volume of Leads
- ✗ Low Lead Quality
- ✗ Poor Qualification
- ✗ Minimal Trust Building
Landing Pages
- ✓ High Lead Quality
- ✓ Strong Qualification
- ✓ Builds Trust & Credibility
- ✗ Higher Cost Per Lead
- ✗ Lower Volume of Leads
And yes, you absolutely have to run retargeting ads...
You hit the nail on the head when you said clients won't buy instantly and have trust issues. The sales cycle for a £100k deal isn't a day or a week. It can be months. It involves multiple stakeholders, internal meetings, budget approvals, and a lot of deliberation. Someone might see your ad, visit your site, and be genuinely interested, but they're just not ready to talk yet. They might need to prepare a report for their boss first.
If you don't have a retargeting strategy, you're just throwing money away. You're paying to get their attention once, and then hoping they remember you weeks later when they're finally ready to act. That's not a strategy; it's wishful thinking.
Retargeting is how you combat the long sales cycle. It's how you stay top of mind, continue to build trust, and gently nudge them towards a decision. But it has to be smart. Don't just show them the same ad over and over again. That's annoying. You need a sequential retargeting funnel that guides them through their decision-making process.
Here’s a simple but effective structure we often use:
- Days 1-14 (The "Proof" Stage): People who visited your landing page but didn't convert get shown ads featuring your best case study or a powerful client testimonial video. The goal here is to build social proof and reinforce the idea that you deliver results.
- Days 15-45 (The "Education" Stage): If they still haven't converted, the messaging shifts. Show them ads that link to a helpful blog post, a downloadable whitepaper, or an invite to a webinar. You're providing value for free, positioning yourself as an expert, and further building trust.
- Days 46-90 (The "Final Nudge" Stage): For the really long-term prospects, the messaging can become more direct. An ad with a headline like "Still struggling with [Their Nightmare Problem]?" or offering a no-obligation strategy call can be very effective at re-engaging them.
This approach ensures you're not just a one-time blip on their radar. You become a consistent, helpful presence throughout their buying journey. It's absolutly critical for closing high-ticket deals from paid ads.
Days 1-14: The Proof Stage
Showcase your best case studies and testimonials. Build social proof and validate their initial interest.
Days 15-45: The Education Stage
Provide value with helpful content like whitepapers or webinars. Position yourself as the expert.
Days 46-90: The Final Nudge
Use more direct messaging. Address their problem head-on and offer a low-commitment next step.
So, where in the USA do you target?
Finally, your question about the best city and states to target in the USA. Tbh, this is another question that starts from the wrong place. Unless you're a local service business like an electrician where geography is everything, it's rarely about picking a specific city. We've run campaigns for services where the best clients came from unexpected places.
The right way to think about this goes back to defining your customer by their nightmare. Where are the companies with that specific, expensive problem concentrated? The answer isn't a state; it's an industry cluster.
- If you sell to high-growth tech startups, you don't target "California"; you target the Bay Area, Austin, and maybe emerging hubs like Miami.
- If you sell to large financial institutions, you don't target "the USA"; you start with New York City, Chicago, and maybe Charlotte.
- If you sell services for the oil and gas industry, you're looking at Houston and parts of Texas, not Boston.
Don't just guess. Use data. Tools like LinkedIn Sales Navigator are brilliant for this. You can build a search for your ideal company profile (based on industry, size, etc.) and then see a geographic breakdown of where those companies are actually located. This data-driven approach is far more effective than just picking a major city and hoping for the best.
And even then, I'd often recomend starting with a broader campaign targeting the entire country (or all relevant developed countries) first. Let the ad platforms' algorithms find the pockets of interest for you. After a few weeks, you can look at your performance data and see which regions are generating the best leads, then double down on them. Let the data, not your assumptions, tell you where your best clients are.
This is the main advice I have for you:
Here's a summary of the strategic shifts you'll need to make. This is a framework for moving away from chasing cheap leads and towards building a predictable engine for acquiring high-value clients.
| Area of Focus | Old Approach (Common Mistake) | New Strategy (Recommended Action) |
|---|---|---|
| Core Metric | "How low can I get my Cost Per Lead?" | "What is my LTV and how high a CAC can I afford to acquire a great client?" |
| Client Targeting | Filtering by demographics (company size, location, job title). | Defining your client by their specific, urgent, and expensive "nightmare problem". |
| Lead Generation | Using low-friction native lead forms to maximize lead volume. | Using a detailed, high-trust landing page to maximize lead quality and pre-qualification. |
| Sales Cycle | Hoping prospects remember you when they are ready to buy. | Implementing a multi-stage retargeting funnel to stay top of mind and build trust over 90+ days. |
| Geographic Targeting | Guessing which major cities or states will perform best. | Using data (e.g., LinkedIn) to identify industry clusters and letting initial campaign data guide your focus. |
I know this is a lot to take in, and it's a big shift from how many people think about paid advertising. It’s not just about setting up an ad and hoping for the best. It's about building a robust, strategic system. It requires a deep understanding of your audience, compelling messaging, and constant optimisation.
This is where getting some expert help can make a huge differance. Instead of spending months and thousands of pounds on trial and error, you can work with someone who has already navigated this terrain for businesses just like yours. We've helped numerous B2B clients, including software and high-ticket service companies, build and scale these kinds of profitable acquisition systems.
If you'd like to chat through your specific situation in more detail, we offer a free, no-obligation initial strategy consultation. We could have a look at your current setup and give you some more tailored, actionable advice. Feel free to book a time that works for you.
Hope this helps!
Regards,
Team @ Lukas Holschuh